Insights · concentration, urban-planning

One roof instead of a hundred halls: why concentration beats dispersion

Traditional expansion builds many small facilities spread across a region. The Dome Sweden concentrates seven sports, health, education and events under one roof. Land, money, time and car trips explain why.

One roof instead of a hundred halls: why concentration beats dispersion

When a region lacks sports facilities, the reflex is to build halls: one here, one there, each with its own car park, reception, changing rooms, boiler and caretaker. Thirty years of that reflex have left Stockholm with 32,300 inhabitants per sports hall against Gothenburg's 12,700. The approach has not failed for lack of effort. It has failed because it is inefficient.

This post makes the case for the opposite approach: concentrate.

What dispersion costs

Every separate hall needs land, and land in a growing capital is the scarcest input of all. Every separate hall repeats the fixed costs: reception, changing rooms, parking, a heating system, maintenance, staff. Every separate hall takes its own planning process and its own years to build. And every family with children in two or three sports makes two or three car trips on a Saturday.

Dispersion also caps ambition. A hall built for one sport in one suburb will never host an international competition, never fund a coaching academy, and never carry a conference centre or a medical floor.

What concentration buys

Put seven racquet sports, fitness, wellness, rehabilitation, education, conferences and a centre court under one roof, and the arithmetic turns around.

One building instead of a dozen separate ones, on a fraction of the land, with one energy system instead of many old ones.

About six tenths of the floor goes to the courts, about a fifth to the centre court, and the rest to the gym, the wellness and medicare floor, conference rooms and the social spaces that make the building a destination. Shared spaces are in use from early morning to late evening instead of standing empty between sessions. The centre court lives every day, with sport on weekdays and events at weekends, rather than waiting for the next concert.

The car-trip argument

Concentration is also an environmental argument. A family with children in different sports drives to one place instead of three. Outside, a sports park with climbing walls, exercise machines, fields and a running track that is frozen for skiing in winter gives everyone who is not on a court something to do. One modern building with its own energy production and heat recovery replaces a scattering of old halls, each heated and lit separately.

The social argument

A hall in one suburb serves one suburb. A regional building, with reserved time for schools, clubs and low-income families and transport links for the whole region, is where people of different backgrounds and incomes actually meet. Concentration is what makes the neutral meeting place possible.

Related questions

Is one big building really cheaper than many small ones?
Per court and per visitor, yes. One site, one reception, one set of changing rooms, one energy system and one management team serve every sport, and shared spaces are used all day instead of standing empty between sessions.
Does concentration mean longer journeys?
For a family with children in different sports it usually means fewer: one destination instead of three, and a sports park outside for the ones who are waiting.
What about the centre court?
It is the part that makes everything else possible: international events, concerts and conferences fund coaching, education and reserved time for schools and clubs.

Talk to us about The Dome Sweden

You talk directly to Fabrice Mary, founder and CEO. We reply within two business days, in English or Swedish.

Request the full presentation and a meeting

Fabrice Mary, Founder & CEO
info@thedomesweden.com
Based in
Stockholm, Sweden

Progress: 1 / 7 · Interest

What is your interest in The Dome Sweden?